Sensitive-feedback response rules
The workflow defines what is monitored, who reviews it and who is allowed to respond. Sensitive matters move to a private route.
Keep information accurate, listen to genuine feedback and agree how concerns move from a public comment to a responsible owner.
The workflow defines what is monitored, who reviews it and who is allowed to respond. Sensitive matters move to a private route.
Requests for genuine feedback are neutral. Review purchases, incentives and selective positive-only solicitation are not part of the service.
Accurate information, verified evidence and explicit permissions support public trust. Any unsupported claim is held for review.
Escalation categories route relevant issues to operations or the authorised professional. The agency does not resolve matters beyond its remit.
Reporting summarises recurring feedback themes and action status without exposing sensitive customer details. Response counts are not rating promises.
The maintenance record tracks approvals, information changes, corrections and next steps so responsibility remains clear.
Industry expertise is the part a generic agency or an AI tool cannot fake. Every claim we help publish is checked against these first.
Pointers for review, not legal advice. Specialist sign-off is arranged where your claims need it.
Use this to judge any provider—including us.
Answer eight quick questions written for dental practices businesses. Get a score, your weakest area and the first three things to fix.
These are the stages we design around. Open the interactive map to inspect the work and handoff.
Publish approved practice and service information.
Reviewed page structureExplain administrative steps and what information is needed.
Preparation information supplied by the practiceRoute enquiries without requesting treatment histories.
Administrative enquiry handoffHandle feedback carefully and review recurring administrative concerns.
Privacy-aware reputation workflowTypical deliverables are sensitive-feedback response rules, neutral feedback-request process, private escalation ownership, publication and permission register. The exact quantities, revisions and handover are fixed in the statement of work before work begins.
Work usually starts with Diagnose the problem (from ₹25,000), which confirms whether reputation is the real priority. The closest engagement, Operate & improve, has a proposed starting fee of ₹70,000 per month. A final quotation follows the scope agreement.
Against measures agreed up front, such as accurate practice information, correct enquiry handoffs, administrative response time. Activity, valid enquiries and client-recorded outcomes are reported separately, and missing attribution is documented rather than estimated.
A named reviewer, accurate business information, authorised images and evidence, access to the relevant accounts and an operational contact who owns the next customer action.
Only with the patient’s written consent, without exaggeration or editing, and without implying every patient will get the same result. Professional ethics and advertising guidelines both apply, so review them before publishing.
Clarity and reassurance: who the dentist is, what a first visit involves, how much it roughly costs, and how easy it is to book and get a reply. Accurate local listings and genuine reviews matter more than discounts.
Tell us about the business, the gap and the work you need. Start with a useful brief—not a bigger package.